• Economy
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Stock
Evil Shark Trades
Economy

TikTok makes its case to skeptical justices: ‘No valid interest’ in ‘preventing propaganda’

by January 10, 2025
by January 10, 2025

The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments Friday morning over whether the social media platform TikTok should be required to divest from its Chinese-owned parent company or be banned in the U.S., in a highly watched case that pits concerns over national security against free speech protections. Justices both conservative and liberal appear skeptical of the social media app’s arguments.

Unless justices intervene, or TikTok’s owners agree to sell, the app will be barred from operating in the U.S. by Jan. 19.
Oral arguments center on the level of First Amendment protections that should be granted to TikTok and its foreign owner, ByteDance.

Noel Francisco, TikTok’s lawyer, told justices in oral arguments Friday that the U.S. government has ‘no valid interest in preventing foreign propaganda,’ and that he believes the platform and its owners should be entitled to the highest level of free speech protections under the U.S. Constitution.

Francisco told Chief Justice John Roberts that he believes the court should grant TikTok First Amendment protections because it is operating as a U.S.-incorporated subsidiary. 

The TikTok attorney was also grilled over the Chinese government’s control over the app, and ByteDance’s control over the algorithm that shows certain content to users.

Asked by Justice Neil Gorsuch whether some parts of the recommendation engine are under Chinese control, Francisco said no.
‘What it means is that there are lots of parts of the source code that are embodied in intellectual property, that are owned by the Chinese government’ and which a sale or divestiture would restrict, he said.  ‘It doesn’t alter the fact that this is, being operated in the United States by TikTok incorporated.’

This is not the first time the Supreme Court has grappled with whether or not full First Amendment protections should be extended to foreign speakers. In previous cases, they have ruled that speech by a foreign government or individuals is not entitled to the full protections. 

The Biden administration, for its part, will argue that the law focuses solely on the company’s control of the app, which attorneys for the administration argue could pose ‘grave national security threats’ to Americans rather than its content. 

Lawyers for the administration will also argue that Congress did not impose any restrictions on speech, much less any restrictions based on viewpoint or on content, and therefore fails to satisfy the test of free speech violations under the First Amendment. 

The court’s decision could have major ramifications for the roughly 170 million Americans who use the app. 

Justices agreed in December to hold the expedited hearing and will have just nine days to issue a ruling before the ban takes place on Jan. 19. 

Oral arguments began shortly after 10 a.m. Stay here for live updates as the oral arguments unfold.

Related Topics

Supreme Court
Donald Trump
Executive Policy
Technology

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Microsoft confirms performance-based job cuts across departments
next post
Donald Trump sentenced with no penalty in New York criminal trial, as judge wishes him ‘Godspeed’ in 2nd term

You may also like

Iran warns US joining conflict would mean ‘all-out...

WH maintains Trump consistent in firm stance on...

FBI Director Patel says man who threatened Trump...

Trump’s approach to Africa lauded by top Republican...

Senate hearing on who was ‘really running’ Biden...

Biden-appointed judge blocks Trump’s move to only allow...

Key Republican vows Israel has ‘bipartisan support’ in...

Thune warns Iran should return to negotiating table...

Alleged Chinese scheme to influence 2020 election for...

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem hospitalized after allergic...

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.






    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Recent Posts

    • Iran warns US joining conflict would mean ‘all-out war,’ refuses demands to give up disputed nuclear program
    • WH maintains Trump consistent in firm stance on Iran nukes — and shows off receipts
    • FBI Director Patel says man who threatened Trump used same message as Comey’s ‘destructive’ Instagram post
    • Trump’s approach to Africa lauded by top Republican as recent airstrikes show ‘outside the box’ thinking
    • Senate hearing on who was ‘really running’ Biden White House kicks off Wednesday

    Categories

    • Economy (6,297)
    • Editor's Pick (3,862)
    • Investing (2,826)
    • Stock (1,338)
    Email Whitelisting About Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Contact Us

    Disclaimer: Evilsharktrades.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EvilSharkTrades.com


    Back To Top
    Evil Shark Trades
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Stock